WTF Was That?! Steven Soderbergh's 'Presence'
I wrote that title/headline trying to inhabit the tone and voice of the characters in the film, in which a family moves into a house only to find it haunted by a ghost. For those of us in the audience, the movie-going appeal of this time-honored premise is that it was 1) directed by auteur Steven Soderbergh and 2) it was shot entirely in the first-person perspective of the ghost.
Upon reading it back, I realized it could be read as criticism of the film, which, after having listened to the spirited debate on The Filmcast episode dedicated to the movie, seemed like a fortuitous mistake that I decided to keep.
![](https://www.carylittlejohn.com/content/images/thumbnail/9879f2c0-0cf8-012e-fb78-00163e1b201c.jpg)
Note: The feature review begins about an hour into the episode and there is a separate spoiler section if you don't want to hear the film's ending discussed.
I'm still trying to decide what I think of the film. I thought it was going to be a true horror film, but it wasn't (in case you're not a big horror fan and have been using that as your reason for avoiding it). Perhaps there's a bit of tension in not knowing exactly what this ghost can do, but otherwise, it's more accurately described as rather serious domestic drama with a large cast of unlikeable characters.
But the conceit of the film was something I was excited about: the first-person POV. Like many things with Soderbergh, he can make it look pretty effortless, perhaps disguising the technical allure of the film (as a storyteller, I'm sure he wouldn't want us to be focused on the camera in such a meta way).
The New Yorker's Richard Brody explored the importance of Soderbergh's deployment of this (potentially) gimmicky exercise and found it not only no gimmick but very much necessary.
![](https://www.carylittlejohn.com/content/images/thumbnail/r45464.jpg)
Comparing it to RaMell Ross's use of the same conceptual technique (though I'd argue harder to pull off than Soderbergh's) in Nickel Boys, Brody said:
But Ross employs his method to create a depth of subjectivity that matches Whitehead’s language, and an intense physicality that surpasses the familiar tropes of cinematic representation. With “Presence,” the eye of the ghost is a matter not of representation but of plot—subtract the subjective camerawork that incarnates an increasingly active spirit, and there’s no movie.